RapidMiner 9.7 is Now Available

Lots of amazing new improvements including true version control! Learn more about what's new here.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD

Isn't Platt Scaling equal to 0.5 at the decision boundary?

moudar981moudar981 Member Posts: 5 Contributor II
edited November 2018 in Help
I applied Platt Scaling after a linear SVM, then applied the model on the training data just to see how the probabilities look like. I expect that the column "prediction(class)" is equal to class "positive" whenever "confidence(positive)" > 0.5. But for a considerable number of feature vectors, this was not the case, as if the threshold is not 0.5.
I suspected that the reason could be that those feature vectors are in the margin of the svm, so I used RBF kernel with very large C and got the results as expected (i.e. 0.5 is the threshold).
Any ideas?

thanks in advance
Sign In or Register to comment.