Due to recent updates, all users are required to create an Altair One account to login to the RapidMiner community. Click the Register button to create your account using the same email that you have previously used to login to the RapidMiner community. This will ensure that any previously created content will be synced to your Altair One account. Once you login, you will be asked to provide a username that identifies you to other Community users. Email us at Community with questions.

"sensitivity/specificity of confusion matrix vs ROC curve"

sozekessozekes Member Posts: 1 Learner III
edited June 2019 in Help
Hi,
We used 10-fold cross validation to classify 55 patients as responders(R)/nonresponders(NR).
Using Neural Network, Rapid classified the data set with 86.67% accuracy, generated 0.933 sensitivity and 0.8 specificity, according to the confusion matrix as seen in figure below.
Rapid also plotted the ROC curve after classification.

The intersection point of sensitivity(TP rate) and 1-specificity(FP rate) is supposed to be 0.933 to 0.2 on the ROC curve (pointed with a green dot on the curve).

But as you can see the red curve gives 0.85 sensitivity for the 0.2 (1-specificity) value (blue dot).

As far as we know the sensitivity-specificity values ratio must be coherent with the ROC curve.
Could you please let us know what you are thinking about this.

Thanks in advance

image
Tagged:

Answers

  • landland RapidMiner Certified Analyst, RapidMiner Certified Expert, Member Posts: 2,531 Unicorn
    Hi,

    what happens if you switch to another way of estimating the AUC? You selected optimistic...

    Greetings,
    Sebastian
Sign In or Register to comment.