ANNOUNCEMENT: WE ARE PROUD TO ANNOUNCE THE LAUNCH OF THE NEW
RAPIDMINER ACADEMY
IT HAS ALL THE SAME TRAINING CONTENT AS HERE PLUS MUCH MORE.
ENJOY AND HAPPY RAPIDMINING!
@sgenzer, Community Manager

Log Loss/Cross Entropy

earmijoearmijo Member Posts: 262   Unicorn
edited December 1 in Help

I'm trying to understand how Rapidminer computes Cross Entropy.  I set up a basic process and asked RM to compute Cross Entropy. I'm attaching the process. But when I compute cross-entropy by hand (excel) or in other programs (R/Python), I get a different number from the one I'm getting in RM.

 

Cross Entropy =  - { y Ln ( p ) + (1-y) Ln(1-p) } 

 

RM Cross Entropy = 0.422

RM Excel/R/Python = 0.3135. 

 

Google sheet:

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1o1r3VgsrJxe4R27SV23WmUy7JVGDFIEMAK3riU-TxV0/edit?usp=sharing

 

Am I missing something basic?

 

Thanks in advance for any help,

 

\E

 

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><process version="9.0.001">
<context>
<input/>
<output/>
<macros/>
</context>
<operator activated="true" class="process" compatibility="9.0.001" expanded="true" name="Process">
<process expanded="true">
<operator activated="true" class="retrieve" compatibility="9.0.001" expanded="true" height="68" name="Retrieve Golf" width="90" x="179" y="136">
<parameter key="repository_entry" value="//Samples/data/Golf"/>
</operator>
<operator activated="true" class="h2o:logistic_regression" compatibility="9.0.000" expanded="true" height="124" name="Logistic Regression" width="90" x="380" y="136"/>
<operator activated="true" class="apply_model" compatibility="9.0.001" expanded="true" height="82" name="Apply Model" width="90" x="581" y="136">
<list key="application_parameters"/>
</operator>
<operator activated="true" class="performance_classification" compatibility="9.0.001" expanded="true" height="82" name="Performance" width="90" x="715" y="34">
<parameter key="cross-entropy" value="true"/>
<list key="class_weights"/>
</operator>
<connect from_op="Retrieve Golf" from_port="output" to_op="Logistic Regression" to_port="training set"/>
<connect from_op="Logistic Regression" from_port="model" to_op="Apply Model" to_port="model"/>
<connect from_op="Logistic Regression" from_port="exampleSet" to_op="Apply Model" to_port="unlabelled data"/>
<connect from_op="Apply Model" from_port="labelled data" to_op="Performance" to_port="labelled data"/>
<connect from_op="Performance" from_port="performance" to_port="result 1"/>
<connect from_op="Performance" from_port="example set" to_port="result 2"/>
<portSpacing port="source_input 1" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="sink_result 1" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="sink_result 2" spacing="0"/>
<portSpacing port="sink_result 3" spacing="0"/>
</process>
</operator>
</process>

 

 

Tagged:

Best Answers

  • lionelderkrikorlionelderkrikor Posts: 575   Unicorn
    Solution Accepted

    Hi @earmijo,

     

    I'm not a specialist of Java but I checked the code of RapidMiner and maybe a beginning of element of answer : 

    I think RapidMiner calculates the Cross Entropy like this (and not like the formula you mentionned) : 

    Cross_entropy.png

     

    The link to this Wikipedia article.

     

    Note : However, I'm not able to find RapidMiner's results with this last formula...

     

    Regards,

     

    Lionel

  • IngoRMIngoRM Posts: 1,422  RM Founder
    Solution Accepted

    If you already got to the 0.45 you are almost there :-)

    Indeed we are using the estimation described in the linked article, i.e. we sum up the log dualis of the confidences of the true labels.  But then we do divide it by (N+1) which is 15 in this case and when you do this, you will get the 0.42 instead of the 0.45.

    I do not remember, but I think we did use the plus 1 to avoid divisions by zero in extreme cases...  for larger data sets, this does not really matter and the numbers are pretty much the same.  For smaller data, like for the Golf data in this case, the difference can be a be a bit bigger...

    I have attached the Excel sheet (embedded in a PPT) showing the full calculation.

    Hope this helps,

    Ingo

Answers

  • earmijoearmijo Member Posts: 262   Unicorn

    Thanks Lionel. You gave an idea: perhaps RM is using Base 2 for the log calculations. This gets me closer to the 0.422. Now I get 0.45. Good enough for me :-)

    sgenzer
  • sgenzersgenzer Administrator, Moderator, Employee, RapidMiner Certified Analyst, Community Manager Posts: 1,903  Community Manager

    @lionelderkrikor if you can give me the GitHub link I can poke around internally and see if I can get you a better answer... :)

     

    Scott

     

    lionelderkrikor
  • lionelderkrikorlionelderkrikor Moderator, RapidMiner Certified Analyst, Member Posts: 575   Unicorn

    Hi @sgenzer,

     

    Thanks you, Scott : 

    After trying many combinaisons of calculus, I still can not find the results of RapidMiner.

    Although I'm not one to give up easily, I must admit that I am currently a little discouraged...:smileymad:

     

    Here the link to the Github repository.

     

    Regards,

     

    Lionel

     

     

  • sgenzersgenzer Administrator, Moderator, Employee, RapidMiner Certified Analyst, Community Manager Posts: 1,903  Community Manager

    got it. I've pinged folks internally and will let you know (or they will post here).

     

    Scott

     

  • earmijoearmijo Member Posts: 262   Unicorn

    Mystery solved. Thanks to all of you. It feels good to understand how things work. 

    sgenzer
Sign In or Register to comment.