bug report in Pareto chart (?)

Status: Investigating


I assume the numbers of 'culumative labels' on this Pareto chart (image attached) aren't the result of the intended behaviour. Or are they?
I guess all the necessary info is on the picture. Should there be more info about the circumstances and so, please, advice me what's needed!



2 Comments (2 New)
RM Staff

Hi @geza_molnar,


Thanks very much for the bug report! 

Yes! You are correct. When the sorting direction is set to be 'descending values' or 'ascending values' the pareto chart is messed up.



A temporary walkaround is to pick the other two choices for sorting direction: either 'descending keys' or 'ascending keys' should work.

ascending keys.PNG

Thanks again for your valuable feedback! We are working to fix it.




Community Manager
Status: Investigating

thanks very much for this bug report. Will follow up with updates from here.