🎉 🎉 RAPIDMINER 9.10 IS OUT!!! 🎉🎉

Download the latest version helping analytics teams accelerate time-to-value for streaming and IIOT use cases.

CLICK HERE TO DOWNLOAD

model for classification

linalina Member Posts: 6 Contributor II
edited July 2019 in Help
hi to everyone! i'm still working on opinion mining and classification into positive and negative comments.my process is this:
 <?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" standalone="no"?>
<process version="5.1.001">
  <context>
    <input/>
    <output/>
    <macros/>
  </context>
  <operator activated="true" class="process" compatibility="5.1.001" expanded="true" name="Process">
    <process expanded="true" height="396" width="687">
      <operator activated="true" class="text:process_document_from_file" compatibility="5.1.001" expanded="true" height="76" name="Process Documents from Files" width="90" x="45" y="30">
        <list key="text_directories">
          <parameter key="positive" value="C:\Users\Fotis-Linaki\Desktop\diplwmatikh\rapidminer\opinion mining\pos"/>
          <parameter key="negative" value="C:\Users\Fotis-Linaki\Desktop\diplwmatikh\rapidminer\opinion mining\neg"/>
        </list>
        <parameter key="encoding" value="UTF-8"/>
        <parameter key="vector_creation" value="Term Occurrences"/>
        <process expanded="true" height="396" width="705">
          <operator activated="true" class="text:transform_cases" compatibility="5.1.001" expanded="true" height="60" name="Transform Cases" width="90" x="45" y="30"/>
          <operator activated="true" class="text:tokenize" compatibility="5.1.001" expanded="true" height="60" name="Tokenize" width="90" x="179" y="120"/>
          <operator activated="true" class="text:filter_by_length" compatibility="5.1.001" expanded="true" height="60" name="Filter Tokens (by Length)" width="90" x="380" y="120">
            <parameter key="min_chars" value="3"/>
          </operator>
          <operator activated="true" class="text:stem_snowball" compatibility="5.1.001" expanded="true" height="60" name="Stem (Snowball)" width="90" x="514" y="30">
            <parameter key="language" value="Spanish"/>
          </operator>
          <connect from_port="document" to_op="Transform Cases" to_port="document"/>
          <connect from_op="Transform Cases" from_port="document" to_op="Tokenize" to_port="document"/>
          <connect from_op="Tokenize" from_port="document" to_op="Filter Tokens (by Length)" to_port="document"/>
          <connect from_op="Filter Tokens (by Length)" from_port="document" to_op="Stem (Snowball)" to_port="document"/>
          <connect from_op="Stem (Snowball)" from_port="document" to_port="document 1"/>
          <portSpacing port="source_document" spacing="0"/>
          <portSpacing port="sink_document 1" spacing="18"/>
          <portSpacing port="sink_document 2" spacing="0"/>
        </process>
      </operator>
      <operator activated="true" class="x_validation" compatibility="5.1.001" expanded="true" height="130" name="Validation" width="90" x="246" y="75">
        <parameter key="sampling_type" value="linear sampling"/>
        <process expanded="true" height="396" width="327">
          <operator activated="true" class="naive_bayes_kernel" compatibility="5.1.001" expanded="true" height="76" name="Naive Bayes (Kernel)" width="90" x="119" y="94"/>
          <connect from_port="training" to_op="Naive Bayes (Kernel)" to_port="training set"/>
          <connect from_op="Naive Bayes (Kernel)" from_port="model" to_port="model"/>
          <portSpacing port="source_training" spacing="18"/>
          <portSpacing port="sink_model" spacing="0"/>
          <portSpacing port="sink_through 1" spacing="36"/>
        </process>
        <process expanded="true" height="396" width="327">
          <operator activated="true" class="apply_model" compatibility="5.1.001" expanded="true" height="76" name="Apply Model" width="90" x="45" y="75">
            <list key="application_parameters"/>
          </operator>
          <operator activated="true" class="performance" compatibility="5.1.001" expanded="true" height="76" name="Performance" width="90" x="179" y="120"/>
          <connect from_port="model" to_op="Apply Model" to_port="model"/>
          <connect from_port="test set" to_op="Apply Model" to_port="unlabelled data"/>
          <connect from_op="Apply Model" from_port="labelled data" to_op="Performance" to_port="labelled data"/>
          <connect from_op="Performance" from_port="performance" to_port="averagable 1"/>
          <portSpacing port="source_model" spacing="0"/>
          <portSpacing port="source_test set" spacing="36"/>
          <portSpacing port="source_through 1" spacing="0"/>
          <portSpacing port="sink_averagable 1" spacing="0"/>
          <portSpacing port="sink_averagable 2" spacing="0"/>
          <portSpacing port="sink_averagable 3" spacing="0"/>
        </process>
      </operator>
      <operator activated="true" class="write_model" compatibility="5.1.001" expanded="true" height="60" name="Write Model" width="90" x="405" y="182">
        <parameter key="model_file" value="C:\Users\Fotis-Linaki\Desktop\diplwmatikh\rapidminer\opinion mining\double1.mod"/>
      </operator>
      <connect from_op="Process Documents from Files" from_port="example set" to_op="Validation" to_port="training"/>
      <connect from_op="Validation" from_port="model" to_op="Write Model" to_port="input"/>
      <connect from_op="Validation" from_port="training" to_port="result 1"/>
      <connect from_op="Validation" from_port="averagable 1" to_port="result 2"/>
      <connect from_op="Validation" from_port="averagable 2" to_port="result 3"/>
      <portSpacing port="source_input 1" spacing="18"/>
      <portSpacing port="sink_result 1" spacing="0"/>
      <portSpacing port="sink_result 2" spacing="72"/>
      <portSpacing port="sink_result 3" spacing="0"/>
      <portSpacing port="sink_result 4" spacing="0"/>
    </process>
  </operator>
</process>
could someone tell me which is the appropriate model for classification to choose? i'm using naive bayes as you can see from the code.but the accuracy in the results is 0%!
what's wrong about it?i have also tried other available models as well.
thank you in advance!
Tagged:

Answers

  • linalina Member Posts: 6 Contributor II
    sorry for the 2nd post! I fixed sth and now the accuracy is 50% +/-16%. for negative about 66% and positive about 33%.
    to be honest, what exactly does it mean? it is about estimation, isn' it?but could somebody explain me in a more detailed way what is it about and what does it mean to my proccess?is it good?i'm afraid not!i'm sorry if i sound silly :-[ !
  • landland RapidMiner Certified Analyst, RapidMiner Certified Expert, Member Posts: 2,531   Unicorn
    Hi,
    we cannot explain you the basics of data analytics here in this forum. Sorry for that. I would suggest to refer either to a good book about it, or participate in one of the basic training courses we offer.

    With kind regards,
      Sebastian Land
Sign In or Register to comment.