# Distance measure with missing values

marcin_blachnik
Member Posts:

**61**GuruI would reccomend to correct distance measures with missing values or at least add some notes on how the distance is calculated (a warrning etc.).

Now the distance is calculated as:

public double calculateDistance(double[] value1, double[] value2) {

double sum = 0.0;

int counter = 0;

for (int i = 0; i < value1.length; i++) {

if ((!Double.isNaN(value1[i])) && (!Double.isNaN(value2[i]))) {

double diff = value1[i] - value2[i];

sum += diff * diff;

counter++;

}

}

if (counter > 0) {

return Math.sqrt(sum);

} else {

return Double.NaN;

}

}

so the missing attributes are ignored, what means that for missing values the distance is smaller then for non-missing. In other words for kNN and other distance based methods the instances with missing values are prefarred/closer than the others. These leads to incorrect classification results.

The state of art pracitce is implemented as

if ((!Double.isNaN(value1[i])) && (!Double.isNaN(value2[i]))) {

double diff = value1[i] - value2[i];

sum += diff * diff;

counter++;

} else {

double diff = max(i) - min(i);

sum += diff * diff;

counter++;

}

where max(i) and min(i) are maximum and minimum value of given attribute in the training set,

or simply diff=1 if attribute is normalized.

Tagged:

1

## Comments

2,959Community Manager