The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. The RapidMiner Community will merge with the Altair Community at the same time. In preparation for the migration, both communities are on read-only mode from July 15th - July 24th, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here.
Options

bug report in Pareto chart (?)

geza_molnargeza_molnar Member Posts: 1 Learner I
edited August 2019 in Product Feedback - Resolved

Hi,

I assume the numbers of 'culumative labels' on this Pareto chart (image attached) aren't the result of the intended behaviour. Or are they?
I guess all the necessary info is on the picture. Should there be more info about the circumstances and so, please, advice me what's needed!

Best,

   Géza

0
0 votes

Declined · Last Updated

The old charts will be replaced by a completely new charting system in the near future. IC-809

Comments

  • Options
    yyhuangyyhuang Administrator, Employee, RapidMiner Certified Analyst, RapidMiner Certified Expert, Member Posts: 364 RM Data Scientist

    Hi @geza_molnar,

     

    Thanks very much for the bug report! 

    Yes! You are correct. When the sorting direction is set to be 'descending values' or 'ascending values' the pareto chart is messed up.

     pareto.PNG

     

    A temporary walkaround is to pick the other two choices for sorting direction: either 'descending keys' or 'ascending keys' should work.

    ascending keys.PNG

    Thanks again for your valuable feedback! We are working to fix it.

     

    YY

     

  • Options
    sgenzersgenzer Administrator, Moderator, Employee, RapidMiner Certified Analyst, Community Manager, Member, University Professor, PM Moderator Posts: 2,959 Community Manager

    thanks very much for this bug report. Will follow up with updates from here.

Sign In or Register to comment.