The Altair Community is migrating to a new platform to provide a better experience for you. The RapidMiner Community will merge with the Altair Community at the same time. In preparation for the migration, both communities are on read-only mode from July 15th - July 24th, 2024. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here.

bug report in Pareto chart (?)

geza_molnargeza_molnar Member Posts: 1 Learner I
edited August 2019 in Product Feedback - Resolved


I assume the numbers of 'culumative labels' on this Pareto chart (image attached) aren't the result of the intended behaviour. Or are they?
I guess all the necessary info is on the picture. Should there be more info about the circumstances and so, please, advice me what's needed!



0 votes

Declined · Last Updated

The old charts will be replaced by a completely new charting system in the near future. IC-809


  • Options
    yyhuangyyhuang Administrator, Employee, RapidMiner Certified Analyst, RapidMiner Certified Expert, Member Posts: 364 RM Data Scientist

    Hi @geza_molnar,


    Thanks very much for the bug report! 

    Yes! You are correct. When the sorting direction is set to be 'descending values' or 'ascending values' the pareto chart is messed up.



    A temporary walkaround is to pick the other two choices for sorting direction: either 'descending keys' or 'ascending keys' should work.

    ascending keys.PNG

    Thanks again for your valuable feedback! We are working to fix it.




  • Options
    sgenzersgenzer Administrator, Moderator, Employee, RapidMiner Certified Analyst, Community Manager, Member, University Professor, PM Moderator Posts: 2,959 Community Manager

    thanks very much for this bug report. Will follow up with updates from here.

Sign In or Register to comment.