Due to recent updates, all users are required to create an Altair One account to login to the RapidMiner community. Click the Register button to create your account using the same email that you have previously used to login to the RapidMiner community. This will ensure that any previously created content will be synced to your Altair One account. Once you login, you will be asked to provide a username that identifies you to other Community users. Email us at Community with questions.
Different results while running a EM clustering process on RapidMiner and weka
I am running the EM clustering for the same data using rapidminer and weka for the same parameters. But I found a different result. Here is my process, data, and result. Why this happens does anyone explain? Thanks in advance.
rapidminer result
rapidminer result
Cluster 0: 1108 items Cluster 1: 0 items Cluster 2: 0 items Total number of items: 1108weka result
Clustered Instances
0 114 ( 10%)
1 813 ( 73%)
2 181 ( 16%)
Tagged:
1
Best Answer
-
sgenzer Administrator, Moderator, Employee, RapidMiner Certified Analyst, Community Manager, Member, University Professor, PM Moderator Posts: 2,959 Community Managerhi @lokraj so getting different results does not surprise me. k-means clustering uses a local random seed to start the process. I don't see your Weka process so I cannot compare but possibly you're seeing randomness at play.
Scott
6