Due to recent updates, all users are required to create an Altair One account to login to the RapidMiner community. Click the Register button to create your account using the same email that you have previously used to login to the RapidMiner community. This will ensure that any previously created content will be synced to your Altair One account. Once you login, you will be asked to provide a username that identifies you to other Community users. Email us at Community with questions.
"PCA Option To Add PCs as Special Attributes"
Hi Guys,
I often run PCA on large datasets to get an idea of the high level data structure. In most cases I just want to plot the top 2 PCs.
It would be great if the PC operator had an option to add principle components as 'special' attributes to the original data.
When I try to 'Join' the 'exa' and 'ori' outputs of PCA I get this strange error (RM 5.08).
Jun 30, 2010 10:19:47 AM WARNING: Error creating renderer: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: DataRow: table index 60 of Attribute 64:Continuity_All_lo:Continuity_All_lo@HBLNA_INP_DRX[1] is out of bounds.
So I cant view the data and it cant be passed to subsequent operators. It should work since the ID column is preserved in both 'exa' and 'ori' outputs.
Thanks, ???
-Gagi
I often run PCA on large datasets to get an idea of the high level data structure. In most cases I just want to plot the top 2 PCs.
It would be great if the PC operator had an option to add principle components as 'special' attributes to the original data.
When I try to 'Join' the 'exa' and 'ori' outputs of PCA I get this strange error (RM 5.08).
Jun 30, 2010 10:19:47 AM WARNING: Error creating renderer: java.lang.ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException: DataRow: table index 60 of Attribute 64:Continuity_All_lo:Continuity_All_lo@HBLNA_INP_DRX[1] is out of bounds.
So I cant view the data and it cant be passed to subsequent operators. It should work since the ID column is preserved in both 'exa' and 'ori' outputs.
Thanks, ???
-Gagi
0
Answers
this process works for me without any problems: This should be pretty equal to yours. Don't know where your problems result from?
Since we want to keep each operator of RapidMiner as simple as possible, we prefer having it this way instead of adding more data (which might cause memory problems anyway) as you suggested. We rather should try to find this bug
Greetings,
Sebastian