The Altair Community and the RapidMiner community is on read-only mode until further notice. Technical support via cases will continue to work as is. For any urgent requests from Students/Faculty members, please submit the form linked here.
Options
WHY DOES THE X MEAN CLUSTERING CHANGES THE NUMBERS OF ITEMS IN THE DESCRIPTION ?
![Preet2Beast](https://us.v-cdn.net/6030995/uploads/defaultavatar/nCCNNSPK1YM69.jpg)
![](https://s3.amazonaws.com/rapidminer.community/vanilla-rank-images/newbie-16x16.png )
Hi,
I was working on a data set and used the K means and then later tried X means too. Though, its quite interesting to notice that the Number of Items in the Description after running the process is completely doubled on using X means clustering !!! ( whereas it remained the same while using K means)
This really fascinates me. I assume no matter what ever the type of clustering methodology we are using, rapidminer should rather not manipulate the number of items in the description .
*does it have something to do with Overlapping lapping Clustering
Any help would be greatly appreciated !:)
Thanks
Regards,
Preet
I was working on a data set and used the K means and then later tried X means too. Though, its quite interesting to notice that the Number of Items in the Description after running the process is completely doubled on using X means clustering !!! ( whereas it remained the same while using K means)
This really fascinates me. I assume no matter what ever the type of clustering methodology we are using, rapidminer should rather not manipulate the number of items in the description .
*does it have something to do with Overlapping lapping Clustering
Any help would be greatly appreciated !:)
Thanks
Regards,
Preet
Tagged:
0
Answers
this is a known bug we are working on. You can change the compatibility level downwards to avoid this.
BR,
Martin
Dortmund, Germany
https://community.rapidminer.com/discussion/54330/x-means-doubling-cluster-item-counts-as-of-9-0-001
Scott